Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:interpretinganalysis [2017/04/22 08:52]
gustavo
en:interpretinganalysis [2023/01/12 07:22] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ==== Plagius - Interpreting the Results of the analyzes ==== ==== Plagius - Interpreting the Results of the analyzes ====
  
-{{  http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XBcOF2OuIIw/UpP4s_Lbs8I/AAAAAAAAD0c/q2UhEYrj61w/s200/lookingatbook.png|}}+{{  https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XBcOF2OuIIw/UpP4s_Lbs8I/AAAAAAAAD0c/q2UhEYrj61w/s200/lookingatbook.png?nolink&200x160|}}
  
-The Plagius is an excellent tool to assist in [[http://www.plagius.com/en|plagiarism detection]], but it is still necessary to apply some criteria in its results.+Plagius is a useful tool for [[https://www.plagius.com/en|detecting plagiarism]], but it should be used in conjunction with manual review.
  
-An automated systemsuch as Plagius, is not yet able to affirm plagiarism directly, only a manual scan can confirm the actual occurrence of plagiarism.+The results of an automated system such as Plagius cannot confirm plagiarism on their own, only a manual scan can confirm the actual occurrence of plagiarism.
  
-The following topics will discuss some tips on how to use the Plagius interpreting the results in the best possible way.+The following topics will discuss some tips on how to use Plagius interpreting the results in the best possible way.
  
  
 === How to interpret the analysis results === === How to interpret the analysis results ===
 +
  
 Despite Plagius brings diverse information in the analysis result, the best approach is still the manual review of the analyzed text: if there are many highlighted phrases together (regardless of color) next to each other means there is high chance of this section have been copied. Despite Plagius brings diverse information in the analysis result, the best approach is still the manual review of the analyzed text: if there are many highlighted phrases together (regardless of color) next to each other means there is high chance of this section have been copied.
Line 20: Line 21:
 When there is a suspicion, the highlighted section must be manually compared to the original source to ensure that is a case of plagiarism. When there is a suspicion, the highlighted section must be manually compared to the original source to ensure that is a case of plagiarism.
  
-[[https://checkingplagiarism.wordpress.com/2017/01/25/plagius-plagiarism-detector-2-4/|{{ :en:result-en-with-tips.png?direct&800 |Plagius Result Screen with tips}}]]+[[https://checkingplagiarism.wordpress.com/2017/01/25/plagius-plagiarism-detector-2-4/|{{ :en:result-en-with-tips.png?direct&800x471 |Plagius Result Screen with tips}}]]
  
  
Line 39: Line 40:
  
 === Other approaches === === Other approaches ===
-In the second tab of the analysis result, "frequently addresses" the Plagius lists the addresses found ordered by the frequency which they were obtained. These addresses are strong candidates for a manual review, especially when the similarity percentage is significant.+In the second tab of the analysis result, "frequently addresses" Plagius lists the addresses found ordered by the frequency which they were obtained. These addresses are strong candidates for a manual review, especially when the similarity percentage is significant.
  
 To assist this individual comparison, Plagius has a feature which helps in this task: Right click on any item in the list and choose "Compare". This feature will be best explained in a new Wiki topic. To assist this individual comparison, Plagius has a feature which helps in this task: Right click on any item in the list and choose "Compare". This feature will be best explained in a new Wiki topic.
  • en/interpretinganalysis.1492861946.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2017/04/22 05:52
  • (external edit)