Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:interpretinganalysis [2022/07/12 12:42]
gustavo
+++ en:interpretinganalysis [2023/01/12 10:22] (current)
gustavo
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{  https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XBcOF2OuIIw/UpP4s_Lbs8I/AAAAAAAAD0c/q2UhEYrj61w/s200/lookingatbook.png?nolink&200x160|}}
-Plagius is an excellent tool to assist in [[http://www.plagius.com/en|plagiarism detection]], but it is still necessary to apply some criteria in its results.
+Plagius is a useful tool for [[https://www.plagius.com/en|detecting plagiarism]], but it should be used in conjunction with manual review.
-An automated system, such as Plagius, is not yet able to affirm plagiarism directly, only a manual scan can confirm the actual occurrence of plagiarism.
+The results of an automated system such as Plagius cannot confirm plagiarism on their own, only a manual scan can confirm the actual occurrence of plagiarism.
 The following topics will discuss some tips on how to use Plagius interpreting the results in the best possible way.
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 === How to interpret the analysis results ===
 Despite Plagius brings diverse information in the analysis result, the best approach is still the manual review of the analyzed text: if there are many highlighted phrases together (regardless of color) next to each other means there is high chance of this section have been copied.